BLOG.GO-HERE.NL

Dear Professor Whitford,

I was reading some of your documents some time ago and I felt sending you a fax to tell you that you are definitely on the right track. So are Shigeyoshi Matsumae and Yoshio Kato of Tokaï University with their most interesting observation as to how nuclear testing affects and produces zigzag movements on the Chandler Cycle.

However to fully explain the inter-relation between quakes and nukes which you have fully aprehended with great insight, you must relinquish some of the understanding of our environment which more akin to religious dogmas than to scientific truths.

Foremost the dogma of the stability of the earth through geological times. Secondly the dogma of the constant gradient of energy through space. In fact we are in an an-isobaric and an-isotropic environment and this can be proven very easily. From that understanding you can induce the concept of buoyancy of the earth within the solar energy environment and mutatis mutandis you can draw the parallel between the earth in the solar atmosphere and a balloon caked with dried plaster in the earth´s atmosphere. Any increase in the buoyancy of any one of the balloons generates in consequence an Archimedian degravitational resultant propulsing it towards a new state of balance within the environment. The consequences for our earth are an expansion leading to fault-forming and therefore quakes and also volcanoes bursting. That prodigious gradient of energy is well known, but it is not understood as such and is erroneously called atomic bonding energy, which then does not make sense in an earth surrounding officially made of empty space, therefore without counter pressure. This gradient of energy has been calculated by Vigier, Boehm and De Broglie.

Incidentally from this viewpoint, nuclear bombs do not generate energy, not at all in fact, the chain nuclear reaction brings about a desequilibrium in the local solar energy gradient of the earth. Of this and of all other irresponsible man-made desequilibriums we shall duly pay the consequences since Nature does not forget, nor forgives, nor knows impunity or immunity.

In such a pressure environment the direct relations between quakes and nukes are of a hydraulic or pneumatic nature so well described by French physicist Pascal in the experiment of the 100 Imp. gallons cask of water blown up by the additon of a small glass of water. In clear this means that any underground explosion of any kind is integrally reflected in the pressure system of which the earth is a part and the consequence is that the weaker piece of the earth´s sphere gives way. The indirect relations are the results of a new buoyancy induced and concomitant research of the equilibrium of the earth within its new environment, in clear its new orbit. In this understanding, you can see the past of the earth, it is called Mars, Jupiter etc… and also its future, it is called Mercury and Venus.

Consequently, what the geologists call ´Continental drift´ is a stupidity because they explain a real observable fact by making abstraction or rather not seeing the difference between structures which are hard and those which are soft. Potters have been the only persons I found that were able to understand the plain evidence that no drifting of any kind can take place in a hardened environment. Potters have been the only persons with whom I could discuss my theories and the orogenesis of the earth and of our solar system. Geologists are hopeless, repeating parrot-like idiocies learnt at university to pass their exams. To account for the phenomena of the so-called ´continental-drift´ I have coined a new word which I call ´Continental stretching´ with ´Inter-continental filling´ accounting for the Atlantic Mid-Oceanic Ridges´ etc. Please, if you were to take on the concept, I would be obliged to you to keep the name I gave to it. As the earth drifts away in a lesser pressure solar atmosphere it expands and its surface stretches and consequently the weaker part gives way thus causing faults etc… It can be observed that the earth and other planets of our lens-like solar system of variable energy , have a density which continuously decreases. In such a lens-like environment all signals coming from space are diffracted and one may ponder upon the statements about the so-called light-years to the nearest star which proceed from the same blind acceptation of orthodox dogmas, just think of Plato´s cave. I do not want to develop any further on this subject but I offer you just a question you may ponder upon : > Just supposing we were all blind , it would be a hell of a calculated distance! You may draw the parallel with the light-years.

With regard to the global concept of a pressure environment (in necessary opposition to the law of universal attraction, which can very easily be proven wrong on that very earth) , you will appreciate that anything which contributes as I said before to the buoyancy of the earth i.e. nuclear explosions of any kind, (underground or in the air) , overgrazing as in Australia, blasting in mines in the wrong sequences as in Australia, deforestation as in America and Africa and the Philippines, the greenhouse effect and especially, last but not least, all wars, all these things contribute to the continuous accelerated destabilisation through increased buoyancy and delayed re-equilibrium of our earth within the an-isotropic solar atmosphere. It leads therefore to the type of rather middle sized quakes you have so cleverly observed and which you have described in your publications. This is why in my previous letters to you I was saying that you were confirming the results of my own research. There is also someone who indirectly confirms it, it is Prof. Von Arx of the MIT, of whom I suppose you have heard, if not, here is the title of his main work : ´An introduction to physical Oceanography´. It is most interesting with regard to the continuous genesis of water and oil within our local gradient of energy. This is specific of our orbit and will cease as we drift away, having probably already passed through a maximum then decreasing progressively, leading to the total disappearance of water from and on the earth. Did you ever ask yourself why the sea water does not penetrate under the continents ?

Do you follow me ? If not, I shall develop, in a later mail, that particular understanding which is extremely important and which conditions the stability of our earth within the ´biological life range´ which it entered not very long ago and in which it is drifting too fast. The proof ? Volcanoes blowing up and killing volcanologists (and others) who do not understand, by the way, the origin of the phenomena they observe. That is why in such a universal pressure environment, you can anticipate with precision a quake 24 to 48 hours ahead, by measuring in a simple glass of water the variation of the rH2, (Thanks to the very experiments and discoveries of Prof. Louis-Claude Vincent and Dr. Jeanne Rousseau. – Dr Rousseau is quite aged now and she is a friend of mine).

With regard to the comments made by Dr Robert Carmichael, an Iowa University geology professor currently attached to the Meiji University saying quote > unquote adding further quote > unquote . Since we are talking about stress, I would like to stress right here that geologists are perfectly ignorant in matters pertaining to the mechanics, mechanics of fluids, hydraulics and pneumatics, further they have a very small understanding of metallurgy and of the processes. As to an understanding of something like the Universal Pressure theory, this would be like a cuneiform language to them. Since all phenomena observed in the earth, particularly with a prospector´s eye, are related to these sciences ; to ask geologists to explain the earth´s evolution and attempt estimations of datation is no better than in the past to have asked theologists or now ask crystal-ball bohemians for the same type of scientific approximations. The only thing they are good at, apart repeating their learned by heart pet theories, is adding millions of years to phenomena they are unable to apprehend. For example the South American rudaceaous deposits which are dated back to the Permien (- 280 millions years) can be elegantly brought back to the pléistocène (about –12 000 years) thanks to irrefutable time-tags, and especially to the favourite tool of the True Geology which is back-engineering.

To demonstrate the geologists´s blindness, I wish to expose here their mad theory of glaciations, which as a mining prospector and therefore gifted with a critical mind – completely foreign to geologists – has always struck me as the ultimate in stupidity and the most horrible hoax since the invention of the square wheel. Historically the theory was invented by Charpentier, then taken on by Agassiz and later boosted by Buckland, Lyell, Murchison etc … It rests on the observation of glacial moraines, originally those of the ´Mer de Glace´ in the Alps. The theory was extended to the entire world , after a visit of Agassiz to Buckland at Argyll, in Scotland. It was recognised as a great breakthrough in the understanding of the earth by the London Geological Society on Nov.8th, 1840. And so from that time on, hundreds of thousands of people have been parrot-like teaching and repeating these idiocies to countless students who religiously have carried on the teaching.

Unfortunately for the theory which has conditioned the whole earth in believing we have millions of years ahead of us still left to wreck our planet, we can observe the poor toothless glacier in its very slow one-way pushing effect. Further, we can observe the immense deposits of all these arenaceous, rudaceous material covering the whole earth from Patagonia to Mongolia and from France to Australia. These larger ones which are called ´pierres roulées´ (which should be translated as rounded boulders), have not been moulded or eroded out of their original sharp-edged shapes by the poor glaciers since you need for that a tumbling effect in the three x,y,z axes. This is completely beyond the capacity of the best minded glacier. You know what a tumbler is, you can see the result of rough sharp-edged stones put in it and left for, say 6 hours, as it is done to a lot of types of semi-precious stones. Then by a mutual-erosion, the stones become eroded into an approaching spheric shape. That is what we can observe the world over and no glacier can do that, unless of a miracle. Anyone believing in glaciation eras is just a fool and the so-called geological time scale, taking as a basis these so called Riss, Wurms etc glaciation eras is indeed the work of lunatics.

I have observed these types of boulders over a lenght of 400 kms along the Pyrénées and on a strip of 100 kms in width. The crazy answer of geologists, completely brain-washed, is that these rounded boulders have been moulded by glacier (evidently) and/or by the torrents and/or by the sea. I have for my part observed that these rounded boulders have no relation whatsoever with the mountain environment where they are supposed to come from, they are quite of the erratic type (most of them quartzite). A thing I have also observed is that if the valley is perpendicular to the Pyrénées axis, then we find the rolled stones right up to the pass, however if the valley sways a bit East or West, we find none. It must be another geological miracle.

Look at their theories with the sea coming and going with continents going up and down like a yoyo to solve the problems of fossils found where they should not be, all this drowned into a sauce of millions of years so that no one is going to go back to check. Just read on what the great Lyell wrote about 54 molluscs found by Darbishire on top of the Welsh mountains of which 11 exclusively of the arctic type. What a wonderful precision in the divination, however if Lyell had been a potter he would have known that pressing two porcelain cups together for a million years cannot get them into softening, they will just break if pressed strongly enough and in the case at hand the molluscs on the top of the mountain would have disappeared with the rubble. Now if by any chance any counter-pressure could have been exerted (by what on earth ?) so that the rock could have reached the softening point, the poor molluscs would have been crushed anyway. So in both cases Lyell could not have found the poor things. The only solution might be that the mountains of Wales were of bubble gum? Certainly that Glaciation tale is one of the best comic plays of the last 150 years or so and I anticipate that generations to come will be using it as a laughing therapy.

Now again, if you are not convinced, you take a friendly glacier and ask him if he could push a mass of primary material to one end of Canada and back to your Fredericton University , starting with what Agassiz calls ´primary debris torn away by the passage of the glacier´. (do not bother about any slopes, the glaciation theory does not care about the land profile either) You will observe that all material on return is intact except the underlayer which has been worn out. An easier way to realise that would be to observe a bulldozer working or simply to carry on the experiment with your hand in your garden. Further, glaciers cannot in the first place tear away material from the mountain, simply because as soon as the pressure is too high, the ice melts and reforms itself after the obstacle. This is a basic Physics experiment of primary school level. Incidentally I have coined an expression corresponding to an evident & easily verifiable fact observable all around the world in all Unconsolidated Sedimentation. This is the pattern of granulometric distribution. It corresponds to what I call " The Cyclonic Granulometric Pattern of Pleistocene Sedimentation" which I intend to develop further to you in another mail.

Now, if you observe the sea backwash you can also see that it produces shingles i.e. flattened stones and as torrents the faster they are the quicker the stones are also flattened. So no one of these three elements, glaciers, sea or torrent can produce the rounded pebbles which, as you may know, vary in size from a mere mm to near perfect spheres of 10m dia. Some of these large rolled stones – which grade then into erratic rocks up to 6 Km long like near Malmoe, can be also found on top of mountains, but this is not a problem either to the Glaciation theory which allows glaciers to scale mountains in reverse direction and to deliver glacial moraines right throughout Europe without taking again into account the topological profile of the lands, all said here to be coming down from the Scandinavian shield which is unfortunately oriented North-South. By the way do you know why the glaciers are supposed to come down from the North (apart from the cold which glaciers seem to appreciate) it is simply because in this country, if we go to Spain, we go down to Spain, even though we have to pass a mountain, on the other hand taking the road to Paris which is quite a flat trip but still go up to Paris. Now for Agassiz everything coming from the North was naturally coming down and this is this natural slope which Agassiz´s glaciers used all the way down to Senegal.

The typical so-called glacial facies which I have encountered in the Great Sandy Desert of Western Australia – of which I explored alone some 30 000 square miles – and also the typical rounded boulders found on the eastern side of the Australian Snowy Mountains must have certainly been delivered by flying glaciers. So would have been delivered the typical material found on all the Atlantic and Pacific islands and in Patagonia… If you want to continue the discussion on this line, please let me know... I will then be able to tell you my point of view on the Canadian bone-bed and on the Alaskan muck. Also on the orogenesis of the earth and also on the orogenesis of the mountain mainly of the Alpine folding. By the way, have you noticed that the angles of opening of the Alpine valleys are greater than those of the Hercynian valleys, do you know why ?

To finish this small note, I wish to stress a very important observation I made overall about the earth , it is the cyclonic granulometric deposition of rudaceous and arenaceous deposits. A typical example would be Bor-Bourak in the Gobi Desert where you have over 3600 km2 of cyclopeans blocks of up to 5 000 tons surrounded by an immense sandy desert. Lately there was a conference in La Rochelle made by a top Belgian geology prof. of the "Université Libre de Bruxelles" (ULB), I put these very precise facts under his nose and his answer was immediate and wonderful of authority, guess what it was. Well it was the wind which did that !!! Present inept Geology is just a form of sect with always ready made answers... I have observed the same cyclonic deposition with graduation of the material in the Sahara desert and also in France.This is a very important observation in terms of prospecting and understanding where heavier minerals can be easily discovered . Do you understand the implications ? These are twofold: one in terms of prospection and one in terms of archeologic research. Do you understand why ? In fact all quarternary alluvial deposits are of this nature, I am not naturally talking about the secondary re-depositions of such mainly Pleistocene deposits ( although the time column means nothing in fact, since all geo datations must be related to position of Earth on Ecliptic) ...

Now as a conclusion, the mad Glaciations theories have to be fought as well as their concomitant datation corollaries indeed. Contrarily to common belief, we have not millions of years left to wreck the planet. This is my reason for writing to you. If you need clarification on some of the points raised in that discussion, please let me know. Please note that I am at the present time a free lance researcher, investigating mainly the huge potential of subsea deposits. You may also forward a copy of this text to Shigeyoshi Matsumae and Yoshio Kato of Tokaï University, and to anyone else as it may please you.

Yours sincerely

Jean-Paul Turcaud

Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant

Australia Mining Pioneer

Founder of the True Geology

Discoverer of the 2400 km² Telfer Mine Copper / Gold mineral deposit.

Now the largest Copper / Gold Mine of Australia.

Discoverer of Nifty Copper & Kintyre Uranium Mine.

( all above noted mines in the Great Sandy Desert of Australia)

as well as of other undisclosed mineral deposits in Australia, unsuspected up to this day.
~ Ignorance is the Cosmic Sin, the One never Forgiven ~


for background info.
http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/nac.html
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm

American Chronicle | TRUE GEOLOGY & TRUE TIME COLUMN OF GEOLOGICAL AGES