Kow wrote:

> "Is String Theory Justified?"

>

> The holy grail of theoretical physics seems to be the generation of a

> "theory of everything". It is the goal to generate a single set of equations

> which deals with all physical processes. Mathematical theoreticians have

> apparently been successful in generating five theories which meet the

> requirements. Some of those theories require 11 dimensions while the others

> require 26 dimensions, as compared to the four dimensions (3 length and 1

> time), of common experience.

>

> The fact that those higher number of dimensions are required shows that

> some of the included processes are completely independent of each other. If

> this were not true, the extra dimensions would not be required. To the

> writer, the search for a single theory is about as sensible as an effort to

> create a single master drawing which would show an automobile engine in its

> entirety rather than as an assembly of individually defined parts. It could

> be done, but it would be so unwieldy as to be useless. Treating the parts as

> individual and independent entities and then showing how thy fit together

> has been found to be a much more useful practice.

>

> When we look at the processes which are described in superstring theory

> we find that we are describing independent process which operate in the same

> region of space. The resultant can be obtained by treating them as

> independent processes and obtaining the results by combining them using the

> principle of superposition. (This is what us simple folks do instintively.)

> The extra dimensions added by string theorists has the effect of

> compartmentalized the processes since each of the dimensions they employ

> must be mathematically orthoganal to all the others It would seem that

> string theory is a sophisticated way of achieving the same result as the

> simpler process of superposition.

>

> It is unfortunate that Dr. Einstein had to resort to the fakery of

> "curved space" in order to overcome the defect caused by the sophomoric

> error he made in the generation of General Relativity. Instead of doing his

> mathematics correctly, he made the equations solve by adding an extra degree

> of freedom. string theorists hav not added one extra dimension, as did Dr.

> Einstein, they added as many as 22! It would appear that the most useful

> result of string theory is to provide employment for theoretical physicists.

>

> ANY JACKASS, OR GROUP THEREOF, CAN MAKE A FAULTY THEORY WORK BE ADDING

> ONE OR MORE SUPERLOUS DEGREES OF FREEDOM. THE THING THAT SEPARATES THE MEN

> FROM THE BOYS IS THE ABILITY TO DEFINE NATURE IN TERMS OF THE THREE SPATIAL

> AND ONE TEMPORAL DIMENSION WHICH WE CAN OBSERVE.

>

> The source material for this posting may be found in

> http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm

> (1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE

> ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS

> TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE

> MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS

> REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM

> THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

>

> All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the

> http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

>

> Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on

> a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy

> as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,

> please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you

> have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

>

> E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your

> mail reception is not blocked.

>

> The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8

> years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE

> MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by

> individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without

> questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be

> objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.

> Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one

> exception for which a correction was provided.

And all that time we thought the "Final Theory" was almost infinitely far away. :)> "Is String Theory Justified?"

>

> The holy grail of theoretical physics seems to be the generation of a

> "theory of everything". It is the goal to generate a single set of equations

> which deals with all physical processes. Mathematical theoreticians have

> apparently been successful in generating five theories which meet the

> requirements. Some of those theories require 11 dimensions while the others

> require 26 dimensions, as compared to the four dimensions (3 length and 1

> time), of common experience.

>

> The fact that those higher number of dimensions are required shows that

> some of the included processes are completely independent of each other. If

> this were not true, the extra dimensions would not be required. To the

> writer, the search for a single theory is about as sensible as an effort to

> create a single master drawing which would show an automobile engine in its

> entirety rather than as an assembly of individually defined parts. It could

> be done, but it would be so unwieldy as to be useless. Treating the parts as

> individual and independent entities and then showing how thy fit together

> has been found to be a much more useful practice.

>

> When we look at the processes which are described in superstring theory

> we find that we are describing independent process which operate in the same

> region of space. The resultant can be obtained by treating them as

> independent processes and obtaining the results by combining them using the

> principle of superposition. (This is what us simple folks do instintively.)

> The extra dimensions added by string theorists has the effect of

> compartmentalized the processes since each of the dimensions they employ

> must be mathematically orthoganal to all the others It would seem that

> string theory is a sophisticated way of achieving the same result as the

> simpler process of superposition.

>

> It is unfortunate that Dr. Einstein had to resort to the fakery of

> "curved space" in order to overcome the defect caused by the sophomoric

> error he made in the generation of General Relativity. Instead of doing his

> mathematics correctly, he made the equations solve by adding an extra degree

> of freedom. string theorists hav not added one extra dimension, as did Dr.

> Einstein, they added as many as 22! It would appear that the most useful

> result of string theory is to provide employment for theoretical physicists.

>

> ANY JACKASS, OR GROUP THEREOF, CAN MAKE A FAULTY THEORY WORK BE ADDING

> ONE OR MORE SUPERLOUS DEGREES OF FREEDOM. THE THING THAT SEPARATES THE MEN

> FROM THE BOYS IS THE ABILITY TO DEFINE NATURE IN TERMS OF THE THREE SPATIAL

> AND ONE TEMPORAL DIMENSION WHICH WE CAN OBSERVE.

>

> The source material for this posting may be found in

> http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm

> (1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE

> ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS

> TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE

> MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS

> REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM

> THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

>

> All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the

> http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

>

> Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on

> a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy

> as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,

> please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you

> have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

>

> E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your

> mail reception is not blocked.

>

> The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8

> years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE

> MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by

> individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without

> questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be

> objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.

> Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one

> exception for which a correction was provided.

It's I think it's quite easy to dismiss the conservation of energy.

The concept is an attempt to define the unknown with other unknowns.

We can't observe energy or mater(stuff). We only interact with a little bit of the stuff, most of it goes hidden. Any way in which we address an amount of energy to the stuff that we cant see can only display a biological statistic of how much of the stuff we pretend to be able to observe.

Imaging HUGE amounds of dark stuff moving straight true the stuff we are made of. It's bumping into our stuff from all angles at all speeds.

All the kinds of attraction forces including gravity are NOT-A-FORCE but only preform A SHIELDING EFFECT. Think of Casimir or van der Waal.

as in:

Earth shields the Moon and the Moon shields Earth.

The Sun shields off Earth but Earth also shields off the Sun.

Behold! The Æther has reborn....

einsteinhoax.comI:- Purpose of Site:- 1.0 -The purpose of this Website is to publish "The Einstein Hoax", with its earlier rigorously derived sources, "Gravity", and "Corrections to Special Relativity". "The Einstein Hoax" is intended for those who have been suspicious of the premise that reality is so subtle that it can only be understood in terms of sophisticated abstract mathematics to which only the elite were privy. The understanding of reality in concrete terms was presented as being beyond the capability of intelligent individuals. Instead, reality turns out to be readily understandable in terms of common sense reasoning once the smoke and mirrors of mathematical obfuscation and the mathematical and logical errors associated with Special and General Relativity have been removed. All that is required in an evaluating their reading of these texts is a good understanding of undergraduate level physics and a passing familiarity with the meaning of elementary calculus. Those without a basic grounding in these subjects will have difficulty in evaluating the validity of the material presented, but they should have little difficulty in following the concepts. (More patience will be required when reading the appendices since they are quite rigorous.) The Alice in Wonderland reality of Black Holes, Singularities, Wormholes, Superstrings, etc. vanishes and, by reverse engineering, the nature, construction, origin and fate of our Universe becomes rather obvious. (As the cycles and epicycles of pre-Copernican astronomical theory demonstrate, General Relativity and the Superstring concept show that any theory can be made to agree with observation if one adds enough superfluous degrees of freedom). 1.1 - When one corrects two minor errors which still exist in the mathematics of Special Relativity, as is done rigorously in "Corrections to Special Relativity" and derives the properties of the gravitational field in a rigorous manner, as is done in "Gravity" (both included at this Website), all sorts of completely unexpected results are obtained in terms which are completely consistent with common sense. These results include the location of kinetic energy, the nature of mass, the reason for the relativistic effects of velocity, the source of gravitational energy, the mechanics of the apparent "Big Bang" origin of the Universe and its subsequent expansion, and even the nature of matter and the source of the forces between particles. The likelihood of the results which are provided being wrong are vanishingly small. Unlike the mathematical reasoning typically used by theoretical physicists, which has the unfortunate characteristic that the probability of error increases with the number of steps, the probability of error when common sense methods are applied in a disciplined and self consistent manner in parallel with the necessary mathematics decreases as the number of steps and factors involved increases. It is impossible to complete a jigsaw puzzle incorrectly. 1.2 - In your reading of the material presented, the author asks you not to take his word or the word of anyone else for anything. Instead, he asks that you check the material presented with your own knowledge, intelligence, and common sense. The only background required to allow you to check its validity is an understanding of College Level Freshman Physics and a familiarity with the principles of Elementary Calculus. Please do not accept the fiction that the subject matter can only be understood by highly educated individuals in terms of abstract mathematics. When an expert cannot make himself understood by an intelligent and motivated layman, it invariably means that the expert does not understand his subject! The author hopes that the material presented passes this test. He can only guarantee, however, that he has done his homework and that the material presented has been developed with extreme care.